The Consequences of the Fed’s Monetary Policy: An Insight with Stephanie Pomboy
In the world of economics, few institutions wield as much influence over the health of the financial markets and broader economy as the Federal Reserve (the Fed). As the central banking system of the United States, its monetary policy decisions play a pivotal role in shaping economic activity, from job creation to inflation rates. With the rapidly changing economic landscape influenced by post-pandemic recovery efforts, supply chain disruptions, and geopolitical tensions, understanding the Fed’s monetary policy and its consequences has never been more crucial. To navigate this complex environment, we turn to Stephanie Pomboy, an esteemed economic analyst and founder of MacroMavens, for her insights.
The Framework of the Fed’s Monetary Policy
At its core, the Fed’s monetary policy operates through two primary mechanisms: interest rate adjustments and open market operations. By setting the federal funds rate, the Fed influences lending rates across the economy. Lowering rates makes borrowing cheaper, encouraging investment and spending, while raising rates aims to curb inflation by slowing down economic activity.
Historically, the Fed has utilized these tools to respond to economic fluctuations, but its approach has evolved significantly in response to unprecedented events—most notably the COVID-19 pandemic. With aggressive rate cuts and expansive quantitative easing measures, the Fed aimed to stabilize the economy, but such actions have left lingering questions regarding their long-term implications.
The Inflation Dilemma
One of the most significant consequences of the Fed’s expansive monetary policy has been the surge in inflation that has gripped the U.S. economy in recent years. While initial fears of deflation during the early pandemic prompted swift action from the Fed, the rebound has led to an inflationary environment not seen in decades. Stephanie Pomboy highlights that while some inflation can be attributed to supply chain constraints, much of it stems from the excess liquidity injected into the economy.
The challenge for the Fed now lies in balancing economic growth with inflation control. Pomboy emphasizes that raising interest rates too quickly could stifle recovery and lead to recessionary pressures. Conversely, maintaining a loose monetary policy risks letting inflation become entrenched, potentially undermining consumer purchasing power and savings.
Asset Bubbles and Wealth Inequality
Another significant consequence of the Fed’s monetary policies has been the creation of asset bubbles across various sectors, including real estate, equities, and cryptocurrencies. The influx of capital into financial markets, spurred by low interest rates, has led to inflated asset prices, raising concerns about their sustainability. Pomboy suggests that as the cost of borrowing remains low, investors are incentivized to seek riskier assets, escalating valuation pressures.
Additionally, the disparity between asset ownership and wage growth has exacerbated wealth inequality. As the wealthier segments of society continue to benefit disproportionately from rising asset prices, those on the lower end of the income spectrum—who often lack substantial investments—struggle to keep pace with the increasing cost of living. Pomboy argues that this trend could have far-reaching social and political implications as economic disparities become more pronounced.
The Global Context and Future Risks
The consequences of the Fed’s monetary policy ripple beyond U.S. borders. As the Fed tightens its monetary stance, capital flows may shift, impacting emerging markets that have relied on friendly financial conditions. High levels of debt in many developing economies expose them to vulnerabilities in the face of tightening credit. Pomboy notes that the global interconnectedness of financial markets means that missteps by the Fed can trigger broader financial instability.
The path ahead remains uncertain. As the economy grapples with the dual challenges of inflation and growth, the Fed’s responses will require careful calibration. Stephanie Pomboy encourages a vigilant approach—monitoring economic indicators closely and understanding the interplay of increased rates, job growth, consumer confidence, and spending patterns.
Conclusion
The Federal Reserve’s monetary policy significantly influences not only the U.S. economy but also the global economic landscape. As we move forward, the ramifications of its decisions will continue to unfold. Voices of analysts like Stephanie Pomboy are essential in dissecting these complex issues, providing insights into potential outcomes and equipping us to navigate the ever-evolving economic terrain. With scrutiny directed toward inflation, asset valuations, and global interconnectedness, it’s clear that the Fed’s policies will be a defining feature of our economic narrative in the years to come.
LEARN ABOUT: Investing During Inflation
REVEALED: Best Investment During Inflation
HOW TO INVEST IN GOLD: Gold IRA Investing
HOW TO INVEST IN SILVER: Silver IRA Investing
Get more amazing videos like this on Real Vision Premium for only $1 for 3 Months here: https://rvtv.io/YTDollarPin
No more waiting for the content to make it here weeks or even months after it was shot and no missing out on insights and information that move markets. Better yet…. No advertisements! Join today!
Doesn’t it seem like a demolition?
I agree with Stephanie, I don't understand Bitcoin. If I buy it for $40,000 per coin, it can easily be $35,000 tomorrow and I lost money. Sound more like stocks rather than saving accounts?
Sounds like President Trump's team was going in the right direction. Now we are going back in the wrong direction. Can't believe we are in this position again?
As one who is retired, Stephanie Pomboy makes perfect sense. Why are there so few who look at her points of view are have some worry as doom is closer than prosperity. Thanks
Even though this interview deserves superlatives, it’s just right to call it competent. Grant has gently elicited the best out of Stephanie, and she, with charming modesty gave a glimpse down into the awesome depth of her research. I will follow this lady’s work diligently here onwards.
She does not hold any punches. Coming from an unsuspecting gold looking charming, well spoken gal, well you could not have found a better messenger.
I think the fed is doing a great job. They aren't responsible for government policy that's fueling the fire.
The inflation is in Asia. the Fed is clueless and the trade war is countering the inflation coming back to USA. Rates will remain Low. Race to the bottom.
Trump threatens, and Powel obeys, while saying he is independent. Also out-of date info 🙂
This was a wonderful interview! I love her insights and even though it’s a dark look at the future, it’s more than necessary to help us to form ideas about how to navigate what may be to come.
She has such a charm! There is no reason for her to at all be nervous about an interview, it was a delight to listen to.
Great interview and lucky to have her…lucid…thinking. Just wish she didn't look so sad…or maybe it is scared?
Its should be illegal for money to rent with no inrest and 3 percent inflation
Economy didn't start to shake because the stock market is not the economy it's the distraction to get people believe we have a ok economy
I want to see more of her. There's a lot to learn from her slightly sarcastic world and witty mindset alone. Thanks for posting / producing this. I'm delighted and will definitely watch this again.
Our current situation is like a debt-addicted teenager rotating credit cards with massive balances and low interest rates, that turns into the Emperor’s new clothes with MMT. That’s what we’re facing.
Silly
I have to disagree, taxation of the wealthy does not destroy entrepreneurial-ism, in other words, it does not stifle creativity, what actually holds our society back is the desire to become wealthy with the least amount of contribution to society, also known as capitalism. Think about it, for example, Bitcoin's creation, no one who created that innovation received any money, yet today, because it is free/cheap for the world to use, it is worth hundreds of billions, creates jobs/wealth for many, a free idea. Also look at many inventions, such as the cotton gin, farming machinery, they weren't invented because someone wanted to become rich, they came into existence because someone was working extremely hard to gain very little, wanted to work less but become more productive. So, it seems, the idea of open source is what is best for society, whereas entrepreneurial-ism creates the most expensive form of creativity available to the world. One who requires to be paid the future value of their creation up front in order for it to proliferate world-wide, is slowing adoption/evolution of the world to a crawl. Innovation and greed must be disconnected in order to prevent economic stagnation, not the other way around. I'd even go so far as to say, that labor, job creation, and taxes of the working class, prevent innovation, because the same workers who on their own would normally seek a faster more efficient way to do daily tasks, are then being required to work cookie cutter factory line type jobs, where they are being told to repeat the same task the same way for their entire lives in order to survive rather than being allowed to create new better ways of completing those tasks, or rather than creating a new original product. 100 free minds create 100 different ideas, but 1 factory is just 1 enforced idea from 1 elite with the money to reproduce an idea, despite likely ever having to actually perform the labor associated with the product, and very often, in situations where the elite who creates the product idea never actually even uses the product in life, simply creates it to sell to consumers other that themselves, thus very little creativity is allowed in our current system of capitalism, it's not a free market economy, functions very poorly, more like an even worse form of the ancient feudalistic system.
Her laughing is annoying .
A small cadre of John Q Public has awoken to gold.
Bitcoin is the internet of money. Because Bitcoin is an encrypted distributed ledger, it requires no bank or government interference. Therefore, Bitcoin alleviates the problems of bank bureaucracy and government interference. Bitcoin helps overcome problems of capital controls, 3rd party interference, inflation, privacy invasion, etc.
Something I do not understand: the guest states at 20:40 that the US just printing new money along the line of NMT would inflate the obligations the US had to its creditors. I thought it would be the opposite: that the US would lose value and that the obligations labeled in USD would lose value. Would anyone take time to explain this to me?
All western countries will be Japeanized. Not only the US. The "box" will be for everyone.
Crypto currency is no better than fiat, for one simple reason, unlimited numbers of crypto currencies can be created.
At 4:00 she asks "what's to stop this game of going on?". Answer is, when they decide, and "they" will be positioned to profit from the crash. Buy precious metals, be overstocked at least with your needs, and maybe even watch some prepper videos to get some ideas.
I voted for trump because he said we need to drain swamp. He railed against the fed and the phony economy. He talked about getting out of NATO. I also don’t like identity politics and elite corrupt hypocrites like Hillary. But nothing will change it is to corrupt. Until politicians are forced to change due to market forces they can’t control will things happen. The Democratic Party is based on race since they discriminated against the Indians, the slaves and now the whites. Now the whites are sick of it. So there will be a tribal war. It will distract everyone from confronting the real problems. Which are the warfare welfare state based on Monopoly money. So we now have a big military, big pharma, big education and big energy bankrupting everyone. Brought to you by big government financed by big finance. Lenin said the best way to destroy a nation is to take over the banking system the people at the top earning money off the scheme will live it and the people at the bottom will be dependent on it. So it is the productive middle that will be destroyed and the nation will fall. Guess he had it right.
She is beautiful and smart =)
This why we should use the real MARKET! If we have to exclude some bad players so be it!
So buy tangible assets, items, gold, and Bitcoin, this how how to play the Venezuela route USA is taking now.
We should have big deflation and let everything to correct fair market value where the average person can afford housing and things but in order to service this huge national debt and pay everyone's retirement and pensions, the FED will monetize everything and then USA will eventually become next Venezuela. This is probably cwhat will happen and is actually happening now thus the reasons why you see all of the protests and riots around the world and will eventually be here in USA. Better move out to the country if you want to stay safe. This is my opinion on what will happen.
I totally agree with this woman. After listening to her for the duration of this presentation I to agree that she is, “clueless”
A gleeful forecaste of Bankings movings for an Authoritarian run society where money becomes digital and even further controllable. The absurdity that is a Magic Show as to how money is created!!! As for Gold; it has been a long time since it was the basis of money and it really is not a very useful metal. Looking at it is about all you do with it. Crypto is a totally manipulated distraction. Back the dollar and keep the existing money in a confident state.
Keep the rich rich is her platform. “A wealth tax would destroy our economy”….. how myopic can a view be?!
Finally finished watching this video. This woman is plugged in….Really appreciate that she shares her insights via twitter. Brilliant interview Grant, and thank you Real Vision Finance for sharing.
…………brilliant….humble……beautiful……….thankyou
Your statement regarding millennials is incredibly arrogant. We aren't naive babies; we've seen previous generations cut taxes and increase the debt and deficit, destroy the environment for profit and put money before human happiness. We demand change and new policies that better address the problems we're facing today.
What an excellent interview. Great job on both sides.
THE TROUBLE WITH PEOPLE LIKE YOU IS YOU KEEP SPREADING THE LIE THAT TAXES ARE PAYING FOR PENSIONS BUT THE TRUTH IS THE GOVERNMENT CAN NEVER RUN OUT OF CURRENCY WITH WHICH TO PAY DOWN DEBT OR TO PAY ANY PENSIONS, THOUGH THE GOVERNMENT CAN DO VERY LITTLE ABOUT CLIMATE CAUSED FOOD SHORTAGES AS IN A GRAND SOLAR MINIMUM WHERE FOOD IS NOT AVAILABLE. DON'T YOU EVER GET TIRED OF ALL YOUR OBVIOUS LIES. EVER HEARD OF JAPAN?
dumb @ss trump voter with a bad wig
30:50 – 32:10 –
It all means that our civic, industrial and financial leaders have failed in their fiduciary responsibilities. I suggest that Congress and the Senate lose their pensions as the average US citizen loses their savings due to inflation.
I got a business grant of $55,000 credited to my bank account all thanks to lutherangrants/org
There's a lot said in this interview, but much important left unsaid.
Japan is not the example of monetary fantasy that people think. Unlike us, Japan has an almost closed financial system that allows the Bank of Japan to prop up the bond market and suppress interest rates. What they don't mention is where the real resources are coming from. Over the decades of its postwar rise and rebuilding, Japan bought or built many assets around the world, mainly in the US and Asia. Japan has run out domestic savings to support its aging population and swollen government deficits. It supports those now by slowly liquidating its assets in other countries. Converted to yen, those assets help prop up the yen's value and an alternative source of savings to live on. This game will end at some point in the next decade.
The US doesn't have this luxury. We have neither current trade surpluses nor a net positive asset position outside the US. We depend on the kindness of strangers, foreigners who invest or lend the money to us. Our having the world's reserve currency has enabled this situation and make it seem natural, which it isn't.
Our situation is more like the deficit countries in Europe. The ones in the eurozone have come to rely on Germany and a few other surplus countries to recycle their surpluses by lending them to the weaker economies. The weaker economies keep getting further and further into debt. This is what will eventually destroy the EU and eurozone. The common currency destroyed many countries' ability to earn their way and support themselves. They've gotten hooked on someone else's surpluses being lent to them.
Even closer is the UK, with its heavily financialized economy, where much of the wealth and income being generated is through financial "assets," meaning money owed by one party to another. There's a depression of real assets, productive assets that can generate income through economic growth. Lacking the world's reserve currency, the UK has gradually become impoverished even as the City of London (its equivalent of Wall Street) has done very well.
We can't inflate our way of it, unlike the 1970s. Money velocity is falling, and the underlying situation is deflationary. Retirees don't spend as much as they do when they were middle-aged. The watchwords are deflation and default — debt written down or written off. The new bond vigilantes will be sniffing for possible default, not worrying about inflation skyrocketing a la 1979.
About 1970s inflation (true money printing), cheap and easy credit, quantitative easing (QE), and the fantasy of modern monetary theory (MMT), here's the most important thing to remember:
Governments and central banks behaving badly with monetary policy doesn't help the poor at the expense of the rich. It helps the politically connected and favored at the expense of the politically unconnected and not favored.
That is, if you're at the head of the line, you're relatively favored. If you're at the back, or not in line at all, you're relatively unfavored and definitely will suffer.
Repeat that to yourself many times and look at examples around us. Venezuela is a clear case, with most of the population greatly impoverished and getting dramatically poorer every day, those who could flee having fled, and only those in, or favored by, the ruling party being helped. (And even the latter are being helped only in a relative sense.)
What's happening here and in the rest of the developed world is obviously not that extreme. It's more indirect and diffuse. But the mechanics are the same: the well-connected (the large, money-center banks that have an outsized influence over Fed policy and all the wealthier classes that borrow from those banks) are relatively more favored. The aging Boomers, who have a large, outsized influence and control over our institutions more generally like policies that keep their assets — real estate, stocks, bonds, etc. — inflating in value.
It's not possible to extend such a system to everyone, or close to everyone. The reason is that the whole gain enjoyed by the "wealthy" (those who own valuable assets) is due to their ability to sell the asset at an inflated price to someone willing and able to pay the inflated price. That selling can only take place in a limited way at one time. Not everyone, or close to everyone, can sell all at once. If they tried, the asset prices — house values, stock prices, whatever — would crash. That's what happened in 2008.
Here's the other side of the fantasy of MMT. Our present upside-down financial system, which is built on ballooning debt which inflates asset values which allows people to borrow more, relies on not everyone cashing out all at once. The "wealthy" (and this means the top 20% or so of the population) are asset-rich, but income-poor. If they're working, they can earn that way. If they're retired, they're really screwed, as their assets cannot generate sufficient income. All they can do is slowly sell those assets. Collectively, those assets can only be sold to younger Americans or to foreigners.
Notice how, in all the talk about MMT or QE or easy, cheap credit, no one mentions debt origination. They all talk about the cost of debt service and owing so much. But no one asks the right question: Why all the debt to begin with? How did that happen? How did college, health case, and child care get so freaking expensive in the last 25 years?
Fed, BoE playing the same game. The wrong game! Classic Economics tells the true story.
Here's a benefit of crypto as censorship resistance. No one can stop what I want to do. It's Sunday afternoon, I want to send you a million dollar of bitcoin so you can buy a boat. Banks aren't open, I don't have to wait on funds to clear, it's not like carrying cash or gold through customs. I just send it to your address. In a short amount of time, you have that million in bitcoin in your possession. Censorship resistant.
The value of bitcoin. It makes governments scared because they don't control it and there is a set limit. No more MMT by central banks. That's the value, it's truth and freedom.